When I began to think about my personal position on Corporate Social Responsibility, I favored a normative approach. Who would not want to do the right thing for the betterment of humanity or the environment given the chance? On the other side is the business case, which is doing what is right, while staying true to your core business. It begged the question, why does a company really exist?
A company cannot make a difference in society if it cannot fulfill its primary purpose, providing products or services, serving customers and making a profit. In 1970, Milton Friedman, wrote if a company cannot achieve these basic objectives, they should not consider participating in a Corporate Social Responsibility role. He indicated that management’s primary role is to ensure it maximizes the returns for the business and stakeholders. Management is entrusted with the investments and resources to create profits consistently over time. Fulfilling this basic business obligation contributes to the economic and welfare of society.
Once a company demonstrates the basic objective of profit it can consider a Corporate Social Responsibility role. The business case provides the opportunity to identify a Corporate Social Responsibility role that aligns with its culture, strategies, business and key stakeholders. To illustrate, if GlaxoSmithKline, a pharmaceutical company, invested funds and resources in saving wild life, it could be viewed negatively, as it is not aligned with its core business. It would be a nice thing to do, but it does not aligned to benefit key stakeholders (normative case).
The business case links the Corporate Social Responsibility to the business strategy. It allows them to target specific investments, resources and budgets to their Corporate Social Responsibility initiative. It creates alignment that is beneficial to the core business, while building stakeholder value, loyalty and brand awareness.
For example, Avon’s Corporate Social Responsibilities are focused on breast cancer, domestic violence and emergency relief. Assuming Avon has a good value proposition around its products and services, this will resonate with their primary customer, women. This alignment creates brand recognition and customer loyalty based on their Corporate Social Responsibility.
The business case allows the Corporate Social Responsibility to become part of the company culture. Home Depot has done an excellent job of incorporating their Corporate Social Responsibility into its culture. As an example, Home Depot donated a half million hours of community service and $11 million in rebuilding the regions impacted by Hurricanes, Katrina, Rita and Wilma.
Doing what is right for the betterment of humanity and the environment is a worthy objective. A company creating alignment will make an impact on business results, brand image, enhancing employees, customers and supplier relationships, while making a meaningful contribution to our world. Check out my pal Teri Radosevich to see what we are doing at Avnet.
Posted under Leadership, Shareholder Value, Value Proposition
This post was written by Fred J. Cuen on January 29, 2009
Twitter










